Your words ring loud this morning, though not too loud to fall on deaf ears. ;)
Get well soon, Harold. :D As Sparky has wisely suggested, now is an opportune time to use your chopsticks. Perhaps you might wish to practise with Sparky's donut. :D
A big welcome to richonline and Max. Thank you very much for contributing here. I will admit that, save the punctuation and "pecking" the many of Harold's comments on purchasing direct email addresses (versus EMFs) holds true in my colleague's case and in my own, Sparky and Attmixer.
Yes, I would say that he has beaten the punch.
Max is not the first post I have read where the gentleman thought he was communicating with a lady who was already seeing a boyfriend or was actively soliciting EMFs for the apparent purpose of generating income for chnlove. In general terms, some experienced users of chnlove advise *not* communicating with ladies whose profiles have been "updated" regularly and to focus on only new Profiles.
I do not know if that is fool-proof advice as I once advised a lady who was interested in me--but not I, her--that she might wish to consider adding more of her positive attributes on her Profile which the translator or agency or chnlove had curiously left off. So, if the "Updated" Profile indeed shows "updated" information, I hesitate to think it is a Profile designed to entrap gentlemen. Obviously, if the update is regurgitating the same nonsense, than I would avoid it like the plague.
But, it would be impossible for anyone to know if it mirrors the prior updates or not unless you had kept an ongoing database of all 6,000 Profiles.
I was not certain when you mentioned 1,000 employees Sharky if you were referring to your own enterprise or just generally. But when you confirmed most recently that you indeed operate the latter I am not personally surprised. What I will say at the risk of self-praise is that I have found the contributors here to be sharp and educated. And I do not simply mean formal training. Smart. Successful in their own right.
Contrast that to posts all over our fabulous internet, some which are flawed with basic spelling, grammatical errors (I am referencing gentlemen whose first language is English, or purportedly so), crude remarks, and you can summarize much about that person, immediately.
I have not had a chance to reply to your private email Attmixer, so I will attempt to do that soon some time today.
Gentlemen:
Your words ring loud this morning, though not too loud to fall on deaf ears. ;)
Get well soon, Harold. :D As Sparky has wisely suggested, now is an opportune time to use your chopsticks. Perhaps you might wish to practise with Sparky's donut. :D
A big welcome to richonline and Max. Thank you very much for contributing here. I will admit that, save the punctuation and "pecking" the many of Harold's comments on purchasing direct email addresses (versus EMFs) holds true in my colleague's case and in my own, Sparky and Attmixer.
Yes, I would say that he has beaten the punch.
Max is not the first post I have read where the gentleman thought he was communicating with a lady who was already seeing a boyfriend or was actively soliciting EMFs for the apparent purpose of generating income for chnlove. In general terms, some experienced users of chnlove advise *not* communicating with ladies whose profiles have been "updated" regularly and to focus on only new Profiles.
I do not know if that is fool-proof advice as I once advised a lady who was interested in me--but not I, her--that she might wish to consider adding more of her positive attributes on her Profile which the translator or agency or chnlove had curiously left off. So, if the "Updated" Profile indeed shows "updated" information, I hesitate to think it is a Profile designed to entrap gentlemen. Obviously, if the update is regurgitating the same nonsense, than I would avoid it like the plague.
But, it would be impossible for anyone to know if it mirrors the prior updates or not unless you had kept an ongoing database of all 6,000 Profiles.
I was not certain when you mentioned 1,000 employees Sharky if you were referring to your own enterprise or just generally. But when you confirmed most recently that you indeed operate the latter I am not personally surprised. What I will say at the risk of self-praise is that I have found the contributors here to be sharp and educated. And I do not simply mean formal training. Smart. Successful in their own right.
Contrast that to posts all over our fabulous internet, some which are flawed with basic spelling, grammatical errors (I am referencing gentlemen whose first language is English, or purportedly so), crude remarks, and you can summarize much about that person, immediately.
I have not had a chance to reply to your private email Attmixer, so I will attempt to do that soon some time today.
Have a great morning. :D