It looks like "Slum Dog Millionaire" picked up all the hardware in Hollywood tonight.
It's past my bedtime but just wanted to add Sparky, CEO (please elaborate what the corporate acronym/name stands for ... lol) that given the number of Globe Trotters on Pfishy maybe someone should organize a jaunt to China throughout the year. We would need someone enterprising enough based in 2-3 of the major capital cities and the regular events could be posted months in advance for lady candidates to attend. They would have to advertise it as an event to meet men from abroad. As long as there is no Full Monty involved and it is in good taste.
I'm agreeable with what Harry mentioned. Some of the remarks on the other (chnlove) forums can be somewhat classless but simply reflects badly on the "gentle"men themselves one would think.
Welcome to Pfishy Attmixer. I will try to give you the full picture to your question. In most cases the email replies are generated by another person. I have had a lady who replied to her own EMFs because her English was very good and she joined Chnlove through a friend who worked at Chnlove. So it worked well for all concerned.
There are two schools of thought on this issue: keep searching on the internet. On the 'promoter' sites they will tell you that the Translator is simply replying "on behalf" of the lady and that yes, the translator often "fluffs" up the language and that when confusion arises (see Harold's post today? to Sky's) it is sometimes caused by another Translator who writes differently. That ostensibly explains why you received varying quality or why your original answers remain unanswered, or they 'forget' what you wrote in prior letters.
The second school of thought (of which I am a student) argues that unless the nature of the transaction is *unequivocally* displayed, it is not only unethical, but fraudulent to presume the recipent gentlemen is awared that the message he receives has been authored totally by another.
Sure, one could argue that the translator was simply "relaying" the message from the original source. I find this argument woefully weak given that "quick" replies appear throughout the day and night.
In essence what it gives is a licence for chnlove (or their "agency") to keep printing money in the form of non-substantial or unsubstantiated messages.
As others have posted here, it is akin to paying for a generic "Chat Line" where, really, no one cares who is impersonating the bombshell at the end of the phone. You simply seek to derive pleasure for the sake of pleasure. I am not terribly interested in that service.
That is not what my $6.25 is paying. I am expecting my communication is going to a legitimate person, that person is receiving what I am communicating in its totality, and that there are no sub-par or malicious alterations intercepting that communication.
Depending on what your own expectations are and what you are wearing (a wife-beater like some of the guys on the promoter sites, or a tuxedo like Sparky on Pfishy, I should think) your conclusion will be entirely different.
Personally, I have better things in life to do than waste 14 EMFs on "maybe" messages that "maybe" were translated correctly and in their entirety to my "maybe" available lady. So, accordingly, one of my pieces of advice is: do not spend inordinate amounts of money on EMFs. You would be far better off contacting at least a handful of ladies.
If you are like most gentlemen, you will still likely have a specific, preferred lady, or two, or three, but be aware that keeping to one only does complicate matters under the current policies and setup of Chnlove. You are playing the lottery but the lottery may already have been decided against you because you are not allowed full access to the truth.
Hello:
It looks like "Slum Dog Millionaire" picked up all the hardware in Hollywood tonight.
It's past my bedtime but just wanted to add Sparky, CEO (please elaborate what the corporate acronym/name stands for ... lol) that given the number of Globe Trotters on Pfishy maybe someone should organize a jaunt to China throughout the year. We would need someone enterprising enough based in 2-3 of the major capital cities and the regular events could be posted months in advance for lady candidates to attend. They would have to advertise it as an event to meet men from abroad. As long as there is no Full Monty involved and it is in good taste.
I'm agreeable with what Harry mentioned. Some of the remarks on the other (chnlove) forums can be somewhat classless but simply reflects badly on the "gentle"men themselves one would think.
Welcome to Pfishy Attmixer. I will try to give you the full picture to your question. In most cases the email replies are generated by another person. I have had a lady who replied to her own EMFs because her English was very good and she joined Chnlove through a friend who worked at Chnlove. So it worked well for all concerned.
There are two schools of thought on this issue: keep searching on the internet. On the 'promoter' sites they will tell you that the Translator is simply replying "on behalf" of the lady and that yes, the translator often "fluffs" up the language and that when confusion arises (see Harold's post today? to Sky's) it is sometimes caused by another Translator who writes differently. That ostensibly explains why you received varying quality or why your original answers remain unanswered, or they 'forget' what you wrote in prior letters.
The second school of thought (of which I am a student) argues that unless the nature of the transaction is *unequivocally* displayed, it is not only unethical, but fraudulent to presume the recipent gentlemen is awared that the message he receives has been authored totally by another.
Sure, one could argue that the translator was simply "relaying" the message from the original source. I find this argument woefully weak given that "quick" replies appear throughout the day and night.
In essence what it gives is a licence for chnlove (or their "agency") to keep printing money in the form of non-substantial or unsubstantiated messages.
As others have posted here, it is akin to paying for a generic "Chat Line" where, really, no one cares who is impersonating the bombshell at the end of the phone. You simply seek to derive pleasure for the sake of pleasure. I am not terribly interested in that service.
That is not what my $6.25 is paying. I am expecting my communication is going to a legitimate person, that person is receiving what I am communicating in its totality, and that there are no sub-par or malicious alterations intercepting that communication.
Depending on what your own expectations are and what you are wearing (a wife-beater like some of the guys on the promoter sites, or a tuxedo like Sparky on Pfishy, I should think) your conclusion will be entirely different.
Personally, I have better things in life to do than waste 14 EMFs on "maybe" messages that "maybe" were translated correctly and in their entirety to my "maybe" available lady. So, accordingly, one of my pieces of advice is: do not spend inordinate amounts of money on EMFs. You would be far better off contacting at least a handful of ladies.
If you are like most gentlemen, you will still likely have a specific, preferred lady, or two, or three, but be aware that keeping to one only does complicate matters under the current policies and setup of Chnlove. You are playing the lottery but the lottery may already have been decided against you because you are not allowed full access to the truth.
If you did, life would be a lot more pleasant.
All the best to you ! :D