Nothing like absurdity on a weekend morning. I choose not to reply directly today that it may actually inspire certain parties to think they have something meaningful to contribute here.
Without prejudice to *anyone* (this means, *anyone*), I should just state for the record: when I originally asked a couple of days ago for *everyone* to reduce duplication it was not intended as a "challenge" or "threat" not to spam. Nor was it even intended as yet another excuse to pitch more insults ("sissy-ness"). Just a request to reduce verbosity to which I am the first to admit.
I had originally planned to post the update of my colleague's own story re. external email address (like Sky's) as told over drinks last night. But given that this forum was, or is, on the verge of being hi-jacked I will wait for an appropriate time.
Nothing like absurdity on a weekend morning. I choose not to reply directly today that it may actually inspire certain parties to think they have something meaningful to contribute here.
Without prejudice to *anyone* (this means, *anyone*), I should just state for the record: when I originally asked a couple of days ago for *everyone* to reduce duplication it was not intended as a "challenge" or "threat" not to spam. Nor was it even intended as yet another excuse to pitch more insults ("sissy-ness"). Just a request to reduce verbosity to which I am the first to admit.
I had originally planned to post the update of my colleague's own story re. external email address (like Sky's) as told over drinks last night. But given that this forum was, or is, on the verge of being hi-jacked I will wait for an appropriate time.
Have a great weekend.